All we can say for sure is that children have always been propagandized at an extremely early age by their parents and teachers with whatever ideology their caretakers are axious to imprint them with, whether it is religious, political, or quasi-religio-politico-symbology.
Numerous examples of such enforced chanting, recitations, singing, tapdancing, parading, pageantry and whatnot can be dragged out, not the least of which can be children made to participate in group prayers which they do not understand, children made to say the Pledge of Allegiance which they do not understand, children made to sing patriotic songs which they do not understand, children made to participate in plays and pageants about historical, political, religious, and fictional events which they do not understand, children made to construct things out of paper and popsicle sticks and glitter to commemorate things they do not understand, children made to recite and invent poems about things they do not understand, children taught to salute, bow, genuflect, courtesy, simper, wink, and kneel to that which they do not understand.... do I need to go on?
Pretty much everything children are taught to do is something they don't previously understand or embrace. The kids shouting blessings in tongues at the paper cutout of Bush are the same as the kids singing songs to Obama.... clueless innocent kids doing these activities to please their parents and teachers for approval. And everyone with an agenda, good or bad, forces it on the kids in their care. I suppose you would argue that teaching kids to pray to God and say the Pledge of Allegiance is "good". In reality it is no different than teaching them to sing songs to Obama or scream blessings at the paper statue of Bush. Just imprinting them with the values of the controlling adults. And the adults doing the imprinting would say it is "good", and those who disagree with those values would say it is "bad" or "creepy".
Do you agree?
Next?
_________________________
Helice ~~~ (Nemo me impune lacesset.)
It is better to be a human being dissatisfied than a pig satisfied;
better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied.
And if the fool, or the pig, are a different opinion,
it is because they only know their own side of the question.
The other party to the comparison knows both sides.
--John Stuart Mill, UTILITARIANISM, 1863