You may present evidence to show that Bush didn't lie, that meetings weren't secret or that Bush and CO. are not scoundrels. If you can.
Oh I don't know. I've seen Lawmage do it in the past, but it's pretty much an exercise in futility. He's presented plenty of evidence to counter the incessant charges of lying and whatnot, but it's just so many farts in the left-wing hurricane. Doesn't really matter because, as a certain well-known radio talk show host has said: "To liberals, it's not the nature of the facts, but the seriousness of the charge that is important."
Sort of like the story I've told before about President Lyndon Johnson. Probably apocryphal, but according to the story Johnson was sitting in the oval office one day musing about how to get out a rumor of a certain Repubican Senator having sex with a sheep dog. And an aide to the President was horrified: "But, but Mr. President, we can't do that. It's not true!"
Johnson chuckled: "Oh I know it not true. I just want to enjoy watching him deny it."