LOL! (Go ahead delete it, it's just funny!)

Well...I saw a study that said all liberals are card carrying old school communists who want to replace the Stars and Stripes with the Hammer and Sickle and eat babies for breakfast...Of course, since I am not going to cite any reputable source for my claims you're just gonna have to ake my word for it.

I have no interest in questoning your claim. I'm pretty sure you believe it. In fact, I won't even bother looking it up because I'm sure I'll find it.

This wasn't an example of Rush's non-garbage, was it? This is just common knowledge among you righties isn't it?

I know, really.

He's so popular, they should give him a TV show!

Would you agree that someone who attacks a person rather than the topic or opinion expressed is a damn liar or a traitor to his country?

Oh please agree. C'mon.... I'm begging you to agree.

Gee, Law, and I was trying to be so careful and literary (literal?) if you will. Rush Limbaugh is fat and so is his bank account!

I think I have posted here before about the different type of thought process involved in liberals and conservatives. It is is not lack of intelligence in conservatives thats the problem, but their strong desire for black and white solutions and the blindness/rigidity that inflicts on them. I could repost again, but its more of a science forum topic I think.



Elitism? No, I don't suffer from elitism, I believe in brotherhood and harmony, which would make me rather un-elitist. Nice catchphrase though, just unfounded. I don't think I am superior in intelligence to conservatives.



Poorly chosen comments perhaps, but hit a nerve on some people I guess, so there probably is a element of reality to it within certain sections of society.

I could remark that the society that conservatives want, looks more like the Soviet Union than anything a liberal would want. A dogmatic ideology, strong leader to instill a herd instinct attitude in the flock, black and white world view; those things appeal to many conservatives. If one replaced five year plans with corporate welfare, then you basically have transformed Stalinism into Neoconservatism.

You can read the entire article which has been published on the net in advance of the Times Sunday Magazine, at the NY Times website.

My favorite part is when he refers to Bill O'Reilly as "Ted Baxter"

All of a sudden, the New York Times is your Bible and every word they print is gospel. Why is that? You've done nothing but bash the Times as a liberal, leftist, elitist paper, and suddenly you're quoting it.